There's a cognominal 1972 film based on "Slaughterhouse-five". When I first found out about its existance I really was enthusiastic, and hoped that this film would live up to the expectations. Now I have to say that in general it did.
The director of this film is George Roy Hill, creator of such masterpieces as "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid" (1969) and "The Sting" (1973) (with excellent actor duo of Robert Redford and Paul Newman in both of these movies).
"Slaughterhouse-five" didn't disillusion me as well. The main characters were played by almost unknown actors who coped with their duties in the best way possible. Firstly, Michael Sacks is exactly the same Billy Pilgrim which I imagined. The rest of the actors did just as well as he and everybody matches their roles perfectly.
This is the third film of George Roy Hill I saw and I'm impressed by his talent to film flawlessly so different screenplays. We know him as the director of awesome western "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid" and 30s criminal adventure "The Sting". But it's in hundreds of times more difficult to shoot a science-fiction film and a film about Second World War at the same time. It must have taken a lot of anxiety and time to make that kind of movie look natural and well-balanced. Plus, it was 1972.
The only problem with this film is the eye-catching "low-budgetness" of it. Certainly, nobody expected something like Stanley Kubrick did in 1968, though it's more reasonable to avoid moments that involve great expenses and replace them with something inventive. It has to do especially with World War II and science-fiction parts. Nevertheless, the director's talent is apparent and Billy's jumps in time are shot ideally.
"Slaughterhouse-five" is very punctual screen adaptation, careful to details, dialogues, general atmosphere and humour. I recommend it to anyone who's not afraid of cardboard tanks and a flying saucer represented by a spot of light.
The director of this film is George Roy Hill, creator of such masterpieces as "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid" (1969) and "The Sting" (1973) (with excellent actor duo of Robert Redford and Paul Newman in both of these movies).
"Slaughterhouse-five" didn't disillusion me as well. The main characters were played by almost unknown actors who coped with their duties in the best way possible. Firstly, Michael Sacks is exactly the same Billy Pilgrim which I imagined. The rest of the actors did just as well as he and everybody matches their roles perfectly.
This is the third film of George Roy Hill I saw and I'm impressed by his talent to film flawlessly so different screenplays. We know him as the director of awesome western "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid" and 30s criminal adventure "The Sting". But it's in hundreds of times more difficult to shoot a science-fiction film and a film about Second World War at the same time. It must have taken a lot of anxiety and time to make that kind of movie look natural and well-balanced. Plus, it was 1972.
The only problem with this film is the eye-catching "low-budgetness" of it. Certainly, nobody expected something like Stanley Kubrick did in 1968, though it's more reasonable to avoid moments that involve great expenses and replace them with something inventive. It has to do especially with World War II and science-fiction parts. Nevertheless, the director's talent is apparent and Billy's jumps in time are shot ideally.
"Slaughterhouse-five" is very punctual screen adaptation, careful to details, dialogues, general atmosphere and humour. I recommend it to anyone who's not afraid of cardboard tanks and a flying saucer represented by a spot of light.